Mapping family affect to adolescent short-video addiction: A cross-lagged panel network analysis
Jiang X, Zhang K
Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 0 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio transversal (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- National Social Science Fund of China
- Gobierno
- the National Social Science Fund of China
- Subvenciones
- National Social Science Fund of China (23BSH131)
Según 2 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2026-04-03 · J Res Adolesc · vol. 36 · número 2 · pág. e70177
- Editorial
- Wiley
- Citado
- 1 cita · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 13.9× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 100 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Mental Health Research Topics · Child Development and Digital Technology
- Palabras clave
- short video addiction, adolescents, depressive symptoms, perceived stress, developmental cascades, neuroticism, fixed mindset, relative deprivation, childhood emotional neglect, family emotional climate, stress regulation, maladaptive cognitions, gender differences, Chinese middle school students
- MeSH
- humans, cross-sectional studies, adolescent behavior, depression, stress, psychological, behavior, addictive, affect, adolescent, child, female, male, surveys and questionnaires, internet addiction disorder, digital media
2 autores
- Xiaoliu Jiang🇨🇳Nankai University
- Kuo Zhang🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaNankai University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Short video platforms have rapidly become central to adolescents' digital lives, yet empirical work on short-video addiction (SVA) is largely cross-sectional and rarely embeds family dynamics within established theoretical frameworks. Most adolescent viewing occurs at home, making familial emotional environments potentially critical, yet understudied, drivers of SVA. To address this gap, the current study adopted a developmental cascade framework, using a cross-lagged panel network approach to examine temporal associations among family ecological risks (family economic strain, parental negative mood, childhood emotional neglect), trait vulnerability (neuroticism), affective states (depressive symptoms, perceived stress), cognitive beliefs (fixed mindset, relative deprivation), and SVA. Two survey waves (6-month interval) involving 807 Chinese middle school students (Mage = 13.57 years; SDage = 0.76; range: 11-15 years; 49.7% female) were conducted. Network analysis revealed robust predictability (R2 average = .32), with T1 variables explaining 24% of the variance in T2 SVA. Depressive symptoms and parental negative mood emerged as key risk drivers with the highest out-expected influence, while perceived stress functioned as a vulnerability hub accumulating upstream influences with the highest in-expected influence. Across waves, depressive symptoms and perceived stress predicted higher SVA. SVA also showed prospective associations with higher later fixed mindset and relative deprivation. Gender-stratified networks revealed broadly similar structures, and supplementary serial mediation analyses provided convergent support for indirect cascade pathways. These findings are consistent with a developmental cascade account and suggest that effective prevention may complement time-limit approaches with integrated strategies targeting family emotional climate, adolescents' stress regulation, and maladaptive cognitions.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.