Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2026

Comparative efficacy and safety of novel Lp(a)-lowering therapies for ASCVD prevention: A network meta-analysis

Wu AX, Wang XJ, Zhao C, Hu JQ, Li JW, Xu Y, Li Y, Liu S

Pharmacological research · 0 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Southwest Medical University
Subvenciones
Southwest Medical University (2025JC087)

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-04-03 · Pharmacol Res · vol. 227 · pág. 108178
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
1 cita · más que el 94% de estudios similares · 6.3× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
60 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Áreas de investigación
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health · Lipid metabolism and disorders · Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Palabras clave
lipoprotein(a), Lp(a)-lowering therapy, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention, siRNA, antisense oligonucleotides, olpasiran, pelacarsen, apolipoprotein B, LDL cholesterol, PCSK9 inhibitors, treatment response, injection site reactions, drug safety
MeSH
humans, lipoprotein(a), oligonucleotides, antisense, rna, small interfering, atherosclerosis, randomized controlled trials as topic, hypolipidemic agents

8 autores

  • An-xin Wu🇨🇳Third People's Hospital of Chengdu
  • Xing-jin Wang🇩🇪Heidelberg University
  • Chen Zhao🇨🇳Capital Medical University; Nanchong Central Hospital
  • Jiaqiang Hu
  • Jinwei Li🇨🇳Southwest Medical University; Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University
  • Ying Xu🇨🇳Chengdu Medical College
  • Yi Li🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaChengdu Medical College
  • Song Liu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSouthwest Medical University; Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined and independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) that is largely resistant to conventional lipid-lowering therapies. Novel Lp(a)-targeted agents, including small interfering RNA (siRNA), antisense oligonucleotides (ASO), and the oral small-molecule inhibitor muvalaplin, have shown potent efficacy in early trials. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to comprehensively compare their efficacy and safety. A total of 25 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 7715 participants were included, evaluating six siRNA agents, four ASO agents, and one small-molecule inhibitor. The primary outcome was percentage change from baseline in Lp(a). Secondary outcomes included absolute change in Lp(a), percentage changes in apolipoprotein B (apoB) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and adverse events. SiRNA therapies achieved the greatest Lp(a) reductions (olpasiran: mean difference [MD] -92.1%, 95% CI -100.1 to -84.0%; zerlasiran: -80.6%, 95% CI -87.7 to -73.5%), followed by muvalaplin (-76.8%, 95% CI -90.3 to -63.2%) and ASO therapy (pelacarsen: -54.2%, 95% CI -72.2 to -36.2%; all P < 0.001). Most agents achieved absolute Lp(a) reductions exceeding 105 nmol/L, suggesting clinically meaningful benefit. Baseline Lp(a) levels significantly modified treatment response (P < 0.001), and concomitant proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor use further enhanced LDL-C reduction (P = 0.024). All therapies were well tolerated, with injection-site reactions most frequent for injectables, while muvalaplin was well tolerated. These findings indicate that targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies substantially reduce circulating Lp(a), with siRNA showing the greatest potency and muvalaplin offering a convenient oral alternative for personalized ASCVD risk reduction.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.