Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2026Acceso abierto

Conversion Bariatric Surgery, Ketogenic Diet, and Intermittent Fasting in Bariatric Surgery Patients with Recurrent Weight Gain: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Şen S, Erdem NZ, Durak D

Obesity surgery · 0 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Mudanya University

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-04-11 · Obes Surg · vol. 36 · número 6 · págs. 2857–2868
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
0 citas · más que el 24% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
60 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes · Diet and metabolism studies · Dietary Effects on Health
Palabras clave
very low-calorie ketogenic diet
MeSH
humans, obesity, morbid, recurrence, weight gain, weight loss, blood glucose, treatment outcome, fasting, prospective studies, adult, middle aged, female, male, bariatric surgery, diet, ketogenic, intermittent fasting

3 autores

  • Seher Dallı Şen🇹🇷 · autor de correspondenciaIstanbul Medipol University; Mudanya Üniversitesi
  • Nihal Zekiye Erdem🇹🇷Istanbul Medipol University
  • Doğukan Durak

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent weight gain (RWG) after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) increases the need for alternative treatment strategies. This study evaluated the effects of conversion bariatric surgery (CBS), very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD), and time-restricted intermittent fasting (TRIF) on anthropometric measurements, biochemical parameters, and dietary habits in patients who experienced suboptimal clinical response (SCR) or RWG after bariatric surgery. METHODS: This study included 56 patients, allocated to four groups (CBS, VLCKD, TRIF, and control; n = 14 each). Weight, waist-hip measurements, body composition, glycemic/lipid profile, and serum levels of specific vitamins and minerals were assessed at baseline and at week 6. Energy and nutrient intakes were calculated using BeBiS-9. RESULTS: Data were analyzed with SPSS 22.0. The percentages of total and excess weight loss differed significantly among the groups (p < 0.001), with CBS (9.07–28.5%), VLCKD (9.12–31.85%), TRIF (5.09–14.97%), and control (0.97–3.40%). Additionally, the pre- and post-intervention differences in fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, cholesterol, LDL-C, triglyceride, and uric acid levels varied significantly among the groups. VLCKD showed a more prominent effect on glycemic parameters, whereas CBS had a more beneficial impact on the lipid profile. In intervention groups, daily energy, carbohydrate and fat intake (g/day) decreased; protein percentages increased; the frequency of consumption of energy-dense foods decreased; and healthy food preferences increased. CONCLUSIONS: Consequently, clinically significant improvements in weight management and metabolic parameters were observed in CBS, VLCKD, and TRIF groups under multidisciplinary team follow-up. These findings suggest that dietitian-led VLCKD and TRIF interventions may be considered as alternative treatment options before deciding on CBS.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.