Conversion Bariatric Surgery, Ketogenic Diet, and Intermittent Fasting in Bariatric Surgery Patients with Recurrent Weight Gain: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Şen S, Erdem NZ, Durak D
Obesity surgery · 0 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Universidad u hospital
- Mudanya University
Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2026-04-11 · Obes Surg · vol. 36 · número 6 · págs. 2857–2868
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 0 citas · más que el 24% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 60 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes · Diet and metabolism studies · Dietary Effects on Health
- Palabras clave
- very low-calorie ketogenic diet
- MeSH
- humans, obesity, morbid, recurrence, weight gain, weight loss, blood glucose, treatment outcome, fasting, prospective studies, adult, middle aged, female, male, bariatric surgery, diet, ketogenic, intermittent fasting
3 autores
- Seher Dallı Şen🇹🇷 · autor de correspondenciaIstanbul Medipol University; Mudanya Üniversitesi
- Nihal Zekiye Erdem🇹🇷Istanbul Medipol University
- Doğukan Durak
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
BACKGROUND: Recurrent weight gain (RWG) after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) increases the need for alternative treatment strategies. This study evaluated the effects of conversion bariatric surgery (CBS), very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD), and time-restricted intermittent fasting (TRIF) on anthropometric measurements, biochemical parameters, and dietary habits in patients who experienced suboptimal clinical response (SCR) or RWG after bariatric surgery. METHODS: This study included 56 patients, allocated to four groups (CBS, VLCKD, TRIF, and control; n = 14 each). Weight, waist-hip measurements, body composition, glycemic/lipid profile, and serum levels of specific vitamins and minerals were assessed at baseline and at week 6. Energy and nutrient intakes were calculated using BeBiS-9. RESULTS: Data were analyzed with SPSS 22.0. The percentages of total and excess weight loss differed significantly among the groups (p < 0.001), with CBS (9.07–28.5%), VLCKD (9.12–31.85%), TRIF (5.09–14.97%), and control (0.97–3.40%). Additionally, the pre- and post-intervention differences in fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, cholesterol, LDL-C, triglyceride, and uric acid levels varied significantly among the groups. VLCKD showed a more prominent effect on glycemic parameters, whereas CBS had a more beneficial impact on the lipid profile. In intervention groups, daily energy, carbohydrate and fat intake (g/day) decreased; protein percentages increased; the frequency of consumption of energy-dense foods decreased; and healthy food preferences increased. CONCLUSIONS: Consequently, clinically significant improvements in weight management and metabolic parameters were observed in CBS, VLCKD, and TRIF groups under multidisciplinary team follow-up. These findings suggest that dietitian-led VLCKD and TRIF interventions may be considered as alternative treatment options before deciding on CBS.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.