Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2026Financiado por la industriaAlimentación controlada

Financiado en parte por Almond Board of California, California Walnut Commission, International Nut and Dried Fruit Council

Appetite regulation following energy restriction with almond-enriched vs. nut-free diets - a randomised controlled trial

Carter S, Hill AM, Buckley JD, Tan SY, Rogers GB, Coates AM

Obesity research & clinical practice · 0 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Alimentación controladaFinanciado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
Comida provista por los investigadores

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Grupo de la industria
Almond Board of California
Grupo de la industria
California Walnut Commission
Grupo de la industria
International Nut and Dried Fruit Council

Según 3 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-04-21 · Obes Res Clin Pract · vol. 20 · número 3 · págs. 244–251
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
1 cita · más que el 89% de estudios similares · 3.1× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
40 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Regulation of Appetite and Obesity · Nuts composition and effects · Dietary Effects on Health
Palabras clave
appetite regulation, caloric restriction, weight loss, weight maintenance, appetite-regulating hormones, ghrelin, leptin, glucagon, pancreatic polypeptide, cholecystokinin, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon-like peptide-1, peptide YY, subjective hunger, energy intake, buffet meals
MeSH
humans, nuts, obesity, weight loss, cholecystokinin, gastric inhibitory polypeptide, peptide yy, glucagon, pancreatic polypeptide, leptin, caloric restriction, diet, reducing, hunger, energy intake, appetite regulation, postprandial period, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, glucagon-like peptide 1, ghrelin, snacks, prunus dulcis

6 autores

  • Sharayah Carter🇦🇺Adelaide University; The University of Adelaide; RMIT University
  • Alison Marie Hill🇦🇺Adelaide University; The University of Adelaide
  • Jonathan David Buckley🇦🇺Adelaide University; The University of Adelaide
  • Sze‐Yen Tan🇦🇺Deakin University
  • Geraint B. Rogers🇦🇺Flinders University; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
  • Alison Mary Coates🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaAdelaide University; The University of Adelaide

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

This study assessed the impact of almonds (AL) or carbohydrate-rich snack bars (SB) on appetite and energy intake. Participants (25-65 yrs, BMI 27.5-34.9 kg/m2) were randomised to consume AL (n = 68) or SB (n = 72) during weight loss (WL) and weight maintenance (WM) diets. Fasting and postprandial appetite hormones and subjective appetite ratings (over 120 min) were measured at baseline (BL), after WL and after WM. Buffet meal energy intake was recorded at 150 min. Fasting ghrelin decreased in AL and increased in SB (group x time, p = 0.011), while leptin had a greater increase in AL versus SB post-WM (group x time, p = 0.001). Fasting glucagon and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) were consistently higher in AL compared to SB at each time point (group, p < 0.001). Fasting cholecystokinin (CCK), glucagon and leptin decreased (p < 0.001), while glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) (p = 0.004), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), PP, peptide YY (PYY), and subjective hunger (p < 0.001) increased over time for all participants, Postprandial AUCs were consistently higher in AL than SB for glucagon and PP (p < 0.001), and GIP and GLP-1 (p < 0.05). Over time CCK and leptin AUCs decreased (WL -11% and -2%, WM -9% and -2%, p < 0.05), GIP and subjective hunger AUC increased over time (WL +17%,WM +12%, p < 0.05). Total and discretionary buffet energy intake declined over time (WL -16%, WM -25%,p < 0.05). Both groups experienced increased subjective hunger post-WL but demonstrated reduced energy intake at the buffet, suggesting effective behavioural adaptations. AL led to more favourable hormonal changes than SB, highlighting its potential appetite-regulating benefits in long-term WM strategies.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.