Caffeine Use in Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Acute Side Effects and Implications for Athlete Health and Safety
Negaresh R, Al-Riyami SAA, Ghahfarrokhi MM, Del Coso J, Karimi Z, Yaghoobi M, Bagheri R
Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 0 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2026-04-25 · Sports Med · vol. 56 · número 9 · págs. 2209–2229
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 0 citas · más que el 25% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 110 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Coffee research and impacts · Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment · Heavy Metals in Plants
- Palabras clave
- Caffeine, Placebo, Randomized controlled trial, Athletes, Meta-analysis, Odds ratio, Incidence (geometry), Side effect (computer science), Systematic review
- MeSH
- humans, headache, caffeine, central nervous system stimulants, sports, randomized controlled trials as topic, athletes
7 autores
- Raoof Negaresh🇮🇷Farhangian University
- Shihab Aldin Ahmad Al-Riyami🇴🇲Sultan Qaboos University
- Majid Mardaniyan Ghahfarrokhi🇮🇷Arak University
- Juan Del Coso🇪🇸Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
- Zohreh Karimi🇮🇷Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch
- Marziyeh Yaghoobi🇮🇷Farhangian University
- Reza Bagheri🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Isfahan
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Given the widespread use of caffeine among athletes, this meta-analysis quantifies the incidence of acute side effects associated with caffeine supplementation. Despite its well-established performance benefits, evidence on caffeine's side effects remains fragmented, as these outcomes are often reported only as secondary findings.
Objective
To address this gap, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed evidence from randomized controlled trials on acute caffeine-related side effects in athletes.
Methods
Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched five databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar) up to July 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials in athletes aged ≥ 15 years examining acute caffeine ingestion versus placebo with reported side effects. Risk of bias was assessed using PEDro and Cochrane criteria. Data on frequency and magnitude of side effects were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses, with subgroup and dose-response analyses.
Results
A total of 48 studies (940 athletes; 63% male, 37% female) were included in the systematic review, of which 38 were eligible for meta-analysis. The mean caffeine dose was 4.9 ± 2.4 mg/kg (range 1.3-12 mg/kg), commonly ingested as capsules or beverages. Compared with placebo, athletes who ingested caffeine self-reported significantly higher odds of headache (Log OR = 0.74, p fourfold higher odds compared with placebo), insomnia (Log OR = 1.20, p < 0.001), increased urine output (Log OR = 1.04, p < 0.001), anxiety (Log OR = 1.29, p < 0.001), and nervousness (Log OR = 0.82, p < 0.001). Meta-regression of dose-response effects showed a significant association between caffeine dose and tachycardia (slope = 0.31, p < 0.001), headache (slope = 0.23, p < 0.001), abdominal discomfort (slope = 0.29, p < 0.001), vigor/activeness (slope = 0.18, p < 0.001), increased urine output (slope = 0.28, p < 0.001), and anxiety (slope = 0.37, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Caffeine intake in athletes increases the likelihood of side effects in a dose-dependent manner, with tachycardia, insomnia, abdominal discomfort, and anxiety being the most consistent. Evidence suggests that, compared with high doses (> 6 mg/kg), low to moderate doses (≤ 6 mg/kg) of caffeine may reduce the risk of side effects.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.