Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2026Financiación no declarada

LOW-LEVEL LASER THERAPY AND DENTAL INJECTION PAIN IN CHILDREN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Amrollahi N, ADEl SAR, Tarrahi MJ, Kalantari M

The journal of evidence-based dental practice · 0 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2026-02-04 · J Evid Based Dent Pract · vol. 26 · número 2 · pág. 102235
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
0 citas · más que el 5% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
13 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques · Dental Erosion and Treatment
Palabras clave
Low level laser therapy, Funnel plot, Confidence interval, Randomized controlled trial, Meta-analysis, Local anesthetic, Cochrane collaboration, Pain control, Publication bias, Visual analogue scale
MeSH
humans, anesthetics, local, pain measurement, injections, child, randomized controlled trials as topic, pain management, low-level light therapy

4 autores

  • Narjes Amrollahi🇮🇷Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • SEYED AMIR REZA ADEl🇦🇹Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien
  • Mohammad Javad Tarrahi🇮🇷Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
  • Maryam Kalantari🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaIsfahan University of Medical Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objectives

Managing pain effectively during dental procedures is crucial, especially for children undergoing local anesthetic injections. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT), or photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), has been investigated as a non-invasive method to reduce injection discomfort.

Data sources

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted up to June 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PBMT for pain reduction. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2 (RoB2) by 2 independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA version 17 on data from studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using chi-squared, tau, and I2 statistics. A random-effects model was employed, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Begg and Egger's tests.

Results

Eight articles met the inclusion criteria, with 6 included in the meta-analysis. The analysis showed a significant reduction in Wong-Baker pain score in children receiving PBMT compared to control groups (mean difference = -1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.43 to -0.07, P = .039). Meta-analysis based on a specific range of wavelength (960 nm) and consistent control groups (anesthetic gel with an inactive laser), confirmed a significant reduction in Wong-Baker (mean difference = -1.30, 95% CI: -2.17 to -0.43, P < .001) and face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scale (mean difference = -1.06, 95% CI: -1.68 to -0.45, P < .001) pain scores.

Conclusion

PBMT was found to be effective in reducing pain during anesthetic injections in children. The application of PBMT (960 nm) compared to a gel-inactive laser control group shows promise based on the Wong-Baker and FLACC scales.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.