The cross-sectional and prospective associations between time-restricted eating and cardiometabolic health in community-dwelling adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Feit V, Schmitz N, Knaub K, Schick LM, Mack I, Shojaa M
European journal of clinical nutrition · 0 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2026-05-23 · Eur J Clin Nutr · vol. 80 · número 8 · págs. 747–762
- Editorial
- Springer Nature
- Citado
- 0 citas · más que el 33% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 62 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Dietary Effects on Health · Circadian rhythm and melatonin · Sleep and related disorders
- Palabras clave
- Observational study, CINAHL, Abdominal obesity, Obesity, Metabolic syndrome, Cohort study, Prospective cohort study, MEDLINE
- MeSH
- humans, cardiovascular diseases, prospective studies, cross-sectional studies, adult, obesity, abdominal, observational studies as topic, metabolic syndrome, cardiometabolic risk factors, intermittent fasting
6 autores
- Viktoria Feit🇩🇪University Children's Hospital Tübingen
- Norbert Schmitz🇩🇪University Children's Hospital Tübingen
- Katharina Knaub🇩🇪University Children's Hospital Tübingen
- Lea-Marie Schick🇩🇪University Children's Hospital Tübingen
- Isabelle Mack
- Mahdieh Shojaa🇩🇪 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen; University of Tübingen
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background/objectives
Well-established cardiometabolic disease (CMD) prevention strategies emphasize maintaining a balanced diet, regular physical activity, and a normal weight. The role of time-restricted eating (TRE; ≤12 h daily eating window) in improving cardiometabolic health remains elusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies investigated the associations between TRE and cardiometabolic health in adults.
Subjects/methods
We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL for observational studies examining the association between TRE and cardiometabolic markers in adults for all articles published up to January 13, 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. Qualitative and random-effects meta-analyses were performed if ≥3 studies reported the same outcome; otherwise, results were summarized narratively.
Results
12 cross-sectional and 6 cohort studies were included. Meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies showed no significant association between TRE and abdominal obesity (OR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.86-1.07; I² = 59%), metabolic syndrome (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.90-1.19; I² = 32%), elevated blood pressure/hypertension (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.971.12; I² = 0%), reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.83-1.06; I² = 78%), elevated triglycerides (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.99-1.14; I² = 0%), and prediabetes/type 2 diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.96-1.12; I² = 50%). Due to insufficient data, no conclusions could be drawn about prospective associations.
Conclusions
To date, cross-sectional data have not consistently demonstrated associations between TRE and cardiometabolic health in community-dwelling adults. Until stronger real-world evidence emerges, the priority should remain on established CMD prevention strategies. REGISTRY AND REGISTRY NUMBER FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OR META-ANALYSES: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023390410.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.