Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2026Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Ultraprocessed Foods and the Risk of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Older US Adults: 2013-2020 Health and Retirement Study

Lee H, McEvoy CT, Steele EM, Khandpur N, Heeringa SG, Ryan LH, Langa KM, Wolfson JA, Leung CW

American journal of public health · 0 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
NIA NIH HHS

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-07-01 · Am J Public Health · vol. 116 · número 7 · págs. 981–992
Editorial
National Institutes of Health
Citado
0 citas · más que el 48% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
0 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Food composition and properties
Palabras clave
Dementia, Cognitive impairment, Cognition, Disease, Cognitive decline, Alzheimer's disease, Epidemiology
MeSH
humans, dementia, risk factors, longitudinal studies, aged, middle aged, united states, female, male, cognitive dysfunction, food, processed

9 autores

  • Heejin Lee🇺🇸American Public Health Association; Johns Hopkins University
  • Claire T. McEvoy🇺🇸American Public Health Association; Johns Hopkins University
  • Euridice Martinez Steele🇺🇸American Public Health Association; Johns Hopkins University
  • Neha Khandpur🇺🇸American Public Health Association; Johns Hopkins University
  • Steven G. Heeringa🇺🇸American Public Health Association; Johns Hopkins University
  • Lindsay H. Ryan🇺🇸American Public Health Association; Johns Hopkins University
  • Kenneth M. Langa🇺🇸American Public Health Association; Johns Hopkins University
  • Julia A. Wolfson🇺🇸American Public Health Association; Johns Hopkins University
  • Cindy W. Leung🇺🇸American Public Health Association; Johns Hopkins University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objectives. To examine associations between ultraprocessed food (UPF) consumption and risks of dementia, cognitive impairment with no dementia (CIND), and a composite outcome of CIND or dementia in a nationally representative longitudinal study of older US adults. Methods. Participants were from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS 2013-2020; n = 5370). We assessed UPF intake via a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire from the 2013 HRS Health Care and Nutrition Study. We defined cognitive impairment outcomes based on the validated Langa-Weir classification from biennial cognitive assessments (2014-2020). We used weighted Cox regression to examine associations. Results. Compared with quintile 1, quintile 5 of UPF intake was associated with higher risks of dementia (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.003, 2.48; P for trend = .50), CIND (HR = 1.46; 95% CI = 1.13, 1.88; P for trend = .03), and CIND or dementia (HR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.16, 1.87; P for trend = .02). Unprocessed or minimally processed food consumption was associated with lower risks of these outcomes. Conclusions. Increased UPF consumption is associated with higher risks of dementia, CIND, and CIND or dementia among US older adults. Public Health Implications. Our findings suggest a potential need to reduce UPF consumption for maintaining cognitive health among older adults. (Am J Public Health. 2026;116(7):981-992. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2026.308505).

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.