Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2026Acceso abierto

Taming the endless scroll? Short-form videos, digital routines and neurocognitive outcomes in youth : a systematic literature review

Ebster M, Lauerer M, Nagel E, Schmidt S

European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Universität Bayreuth

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-06-13 · Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
2 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 27.8× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
78 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Child Development and Digital Technology · Technology Use by Older Adults
Palabras clave
short-form video, youth media use, neuropsychological outcomes, inattention, impulsivity, working memory, self-regulation, anxiety, depression, stress, addiction symptoms, digital literacy, gray matter volume, P300, orbitofrontal cortex, cerebellum, attention, emotional well-being

4 autores

  • Marlene Ebster🇦🇺🇩🇪 · autor de correspondenciaQueensland University of Technology; University of Bayreuth
  • Michael Lauerer🇩🇪University of Bayreuth
  • Eckhard Nagel🇩🇪Medizinische Universität Lausitz - Carl Thiem; University of Bayreuth
  • Sebastian Schmidt🇩🇪 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Bayreuth

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Short-form videos (SFVs) deliver digital content in a way that sets them apart from other media. Concerns have arisen that such user interfaces may diminish attention, memory and emotional wellbeing in young people, yet evidence has not previously been synthesised for this demographic and in isolation from other media types. To assess the association between exposure to SFV-interfaces and neurocognitive outcomes in individuals aged [Formula: see text] years, and to appraise the certainty of this evidence. Following PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines, four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, WoS, Cochrane Reviews) were searched (2015-2025). Of 1,498 records, 42 studies (N = 46,912; mean age = 16.8) met the PICOS criteria. Most were cross-sectional (88%), with two longitudinal, one EEG, and one MRI study. Risk of bias and quality were evaluated using GRADE. Heavy, unstructured SFV use (typically [Formula: see text] h/day) was consistently associated with: small-to-moderate increases in inattention ([Formula: see text]) and impulsivity ([Formula: see text]); moderate reductions in working-memory span ([Formula: see text]) and self-regulation ([Formula: see text]); moderate elevations in anxiety ([Formula: see text]), depression ([Formula: see text]) and stress ([Formula: see text]); and a moderate-to-large surge in addiction symptoms ([Formula: see text]). Two cross-sectional imaging studies also reported associations between heavier short-video use and neurobiological measures. These included grey-matter volume differences in the orbitofrontal cortex and cerebellum, altered resting-state signal synchrony, and reduced P300 amplitudes. Protective factors included supportive environments, digital routines, and digital literacy. Consistent, albeit preliminary, evidence links excessive SFV watching to cognitive and emotional challenges in youth. Longitudinal and experimental studies are urgently needed, alongside trials of modifiable levers to reduce addiction-like use and related harms.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.