Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2026Acceso abierto

Efficacy of 8% arginine associated with low-level laser therapy in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: randomized double-blind clinical trial

Leal Barbosa V, Westenhofen D, Scherdien Silva P, Zimmer R, Rivera Oballe H, Quevedo Miguens Júnior SA, Galia Reston E

Lasers in medical science · 0 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Universidad u hospital
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
Subvenciones
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior ((Code 001))

Según 2 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-06-20 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 41 · número 1
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
0 citas · más que el 43% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
28 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Dental Erosion and Treatment · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Dental Health and Care Utilization
Palabras clave
dentin hypersensitivity, low-level laser therapy, tactile sensitivity, combination therapy, dental pain
MeSH
humans, dentin sensitivity, arginine, pain measurement, treatment outcome, combined modality therapy, double-blind method, adult, middle aged, female, male, young adult, dentin desensitizing agents, low-level light therapy

7 autores

  • Viviane Leal Barbosa🇧🇷Universidade Luterana do Brasil
  • Djuly Westenhofen🇧🇷Universidade Luterana do Brasil
  • Paola Scherdien Silva🇧🇷Universidade Luterana do Brasil
  • Reinhold Zimmer🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul; Universidade Luterana do Brasil
  • Harry Juan Rivera Oballe🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Pelotas; Universidade Luterana do Brasil
  • Sérgio Augusto Quevedo Miguens🇧🇷Universidade Luterana do Brasil
  • Eduardo Galia Reston🇧🇷Universidade Luterana do Brasil

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of 8% arginine-based desensitizing toothpaste and photobiomodulation (PBM), used alone or in combination, in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH).

Materials and methods

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial included participants with DH who were allocated into four groups: laser group (LG), arginine group (AG), combined laser and arginine group (LAG), and control group (CG). Clinical assessments were performed at baseline and after 2, 4, and 8 weeks. DH was evaluated using evaporative (air stimulus) and tactile tests applied to the cervical-buccal surface of the teeth, with pain intensity recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Linear mixed-effects models were used for longitudinal continuous outcomes (Schiff and VAS scores), while generalized estimating equations were applied for tactile sensitivity outcomes, adopting a significance level of 5%.

Results

A total of 60 participants were enrolled, and 54 completed the study. A significant reduction in DH was observed over time for both Schiff scores and VAS values (p 0.05).

Conclusions

All evaluated therapies were effective in reducing DH over the 8-week follow-up period, with a progressive reduction in symptoms over time. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the interventions, and no additive effect was identified for the combined therapy.

Clinical trial registration

Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry ReBEC; RBR2vxzvkz, October 13th, 2023.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.