Comparison of posterior scleral reinforcement surgery and repeated low-level red-light therapy in controlling high and super high myopia in Chinese children
Ma SY, Yang MY, Fu AC, Meng J, Li XJ
International journal of ophthalmology · 0 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Ensayo clínico controlado (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2026-06-16 · Int J Ophthalmol · vol. 19 · número 7 · págs. 1357–1365
- Editorial
- Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
- Citado
- 0 citas · más que el 54% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 0 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Áreas de investigación
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Corneal surgery and disorders · Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Palabras clave
- Reinforcement, Visual acuity, Subgroup analysis, Reduction (mathematics), Adverse effect
4 autores
- Si-Yu Ma🇨🇳First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
- Aicun Fu🇨🇳First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
- Jia Meng🇨🇳First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
- Xiu-Juan Li🇨🇳First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Aim
To compare the efficacy of posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) surgery versus repeated low-level red light therapy (RLRL) treatment in controlling high and super high myopia (HM and SHM) of Chinese children.
Methods
This retrospective case analysis enrolled Chinese children with HM (-6.00 to -10.00 D; 76 children, 120 eyes) or SHM (<-10.00 D; 82 children, 114 eyes) according to spherical equivalent (SE). Each group was further subdivided into PSR subgroup [single-vision spectacle lenses (SVS) combined with PSR surgery], RLRL subgroup (SVS combined with RLRL therapy), and control subgroup (SVS alone). All participants were followed up at baseline, 3mo, 1, and 2y after treatment. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), axial length (AL), SE, and adverse reactions were evaluated.
Results
A total of 158 children (234 eyes) aged 6-16y were enrolled consecutively. Baseline BCVA, AL and SE were comparable among subgroups in both HM and SHM groups (all P>0.05). In the PSR group, BCVA improved significantly at 1 and 2y in both myopia groups (all PPP>0.05). In the RLRL group, BCVA was significantly improved at 1 and 2y, while AL shortened and SE decreased obviously from 3mo to 2y after treatment (all PP<0.05).
Conclusion
PSR and RLRL effectively improve BCVA in children with HM and SHM. PSR slows AL and SE progression, whereas RLRL reduces AL and SE, with better BCVA and AL outcomes in SHM at 1 and 2y. Both interventions are safe without severe adverse events within 2y. As a non-surgical approach, RLRL has promising clinical value.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.