Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2026Acceso abierto

Effect of photobiomodulation on fatigue-related errors in ankle joint position reproduction: the moderating role of perceived ankle instability in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Ikuta Y, Yamakawa R, Toriyama M, Ito H, Nakasa T, Mikami Y, Adachi N

Lasers in medical science · 0 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Hiroshima University

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-07-24 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 41 · número 1
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
0 citas · más que el 58% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
27 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Foot and Ankle Surgery · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, fatigue, Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool, proprioception, effect modification, chronic ankle instability
MeSH
ankle joint, humans, joint instability, fatigue, proprioception, muscle fatigue, adult, female, male, young adult, low-level light therapy

7 autores

  • Yasunari Ikuta🇯🇵 · autor de correspondenciaHiroshima University; Hiroshima University Hospital
  • Ryuya Yamakawa🇯🇵Hiroshima University Hospital
  • Minoru Toriyama🇯🇵Hiroshima University Hospital
  • Hajime Ito🇯🇵Hiroshima University Hospital
  • Tomoyuki Nakasa🇯🇵Hiroshima University
  • Yukio Mikami🇯🇵Hiroshima University Hospital
  • Nobuo Adachi🇯🇵Hiroshima University Hospital

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

To investigate whether pre-exercise photobiomodulation (PBM) attenuates fatigue-induced decline in ankle joint position reproduction (JPR) and determine whether perceived ankle instability modifies this response. In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial with participant blinding and blinded outcome assessment, 30 healthy young adults (age: 24.3 ± 3.7 years; 15 male, 15 female) received either PBM or placebo treatment applied to the lower-leg musculature before a fatiguing protocol. PBM parameters included a wavelength of 830 nm, average power of 1 W, and total energy of 300 J per limb. Ankle JPR was assessed before and after fatigue. Participants were stratified by Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) scores. All physical assessments were performed by independent outcome assessors blinded to group allocation, with each participant evaluated by the same designated assessor throughout the study. The primary analysis revealed no overall between-group difference in fatigue-related changes in ankle JPR. A secondary exploratory group × CAIT interaction was observed, suggesting potential effect modification by perceived ankle instability. In the higher perceived instability subgroup, the estimated between-group difference was consistent with less post-fatigue worsening of JPR error following PBM; however, this estimate was based on small subgroup sizes and was not adjusted for multiple comparisons. The primary hypothesis was not supported; pre-exercise PBM showed no overall effect on fatigue-induced changes in ankle JPR. The exploratory group × CAIT interaction suggests that perceived ankle instability may be an effect modifier the response to PBM. However, this hypothesis requires confirmation in a larger, preregistered trial prospectively powered for interaction testing and incorporating functional outcomes in populations with clinically diagnosed chronic ankle instability.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.