Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2026Acceso abierto

Relationships Between Psychological Resilience, Rejection Sensitivity, and Short-Video Addiction in University Students: A Cross-Lagged Analysis

Liu Y, Xie M, Zhang S

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 0 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Guangxi Philosophy and Social Science Foundation Project

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-07-21 · Behav Sci (Basel) · vol. 16 · número 7 · pág. 1238
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
0 citas · más que el 57% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
55 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Resilience and Mental Health · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Palabras clave
short video addiction, psychological resilience, rejection sensitivity, university students, I-PACE model, protective factors, vulnerability factors, digital addiction prevention, Chinese university students

3 autores

  • Yang Liu🇨🇳Guangxi Normal University; Beibu Gulf University
  • Min Xie🇨🇳Guangxi Normal University
  • Shuyue Zhang🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaGuangxi Normal University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Short-video addiction has emerged as a growing behavioral concern in the context of the widespread use of platforms such as Douyin and TikTok, posing potential risks to young adults' psychological well-being. Psychological resilience and rejection sensitivity are considered important psychological characteristics that may function as protective and risk factors, respectively, in the development of addictive media use. However, the longitudinal interplay among these variables remains insufficiently understood. This study examined the longitudinal relationships among psychological resilience, rejection sensitivity, and short-video addiction over time among university students. A two-wave longitudinal design with a six-month interval was conducted among 1394 Chinese university students. Participants completed validated measures assessing short-video addiction, psychological resilience (CD-RISC-10), and rejection sensitivity (RSQ). Cross-lagged panel modeling (CLPM) was employed to investigate the bidirectional predictive associations among these variables while controlling for autoregressive effects. All three constructs demonstrated substantial temporal stability across the two measurement waves. Cross-lagged analyses indicated that higher psychological resilience at Time 1 predicted lower rejection sensitivity and lower short-video addiction at Time 2, whereas higher rejection sensitivity at Time 1 predicted lower psychological resilience and higher short-video addiction over time. Although these longitudinal associations were statistically significant, their effect sizes were modest. These findings suggest that psychological resilience and rejection sensitivity may represent protective and vulnerability-related psychological characteristics associated with short-video addiction over time. The findings support the I-PACE model by highlighting the dynamic and longitudinal associations among psychological resources, interpersonal vulnerability, and addictive digital behaviors. Interventions aimed at strengthening psychological resilience and reducing rejection sensitivity may contribute to preventing short-video addiction and promoting healthier digital engagement among university students.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.