Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2026Acceso abierto

DHA Alone, EPA + DHA, EPA + DHA + GLA, and EPA + DHA with or Without Vitamin D During Chemotherapy in Women with Breast Cancer: An Intervention- and Outcome-Stratified Systematic Review

Fronk K, Wysokiński M, Podgórski R, Łuszczki E

Nutrients · 0 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-08-01 · Nutrients · vol. 18 · número 15 · pág. 2483
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
0 citas · más que el 52% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
24 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Cancer survivorship and care · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Palabras clave
omega-3 fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic acid, vitamin D, breast cancer, chemotherapy, fish oil supplementation, quality of life, nutritional status, treatment-related adverse events
MeSH
humans, breast neoplasms, docosahexaenoic acids, eicosapentaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic acid, vitamin d, treatment outcome, quality of life, dietary supplements, female

4 autores

  • Kinga Fronk
  • Mariusz Wysokiński🇵🇱Medical University of Lublin
  • Rafał Podgórski🇵🇱University of Rzeszów
  • Edyta Łuszczki🇵🇱 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Rzeszów

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background/Objectives: Prospective studies of omega-3 supplementation during breast cancer chemotherapy differ in intervention composition, co-supplementation, dose, treatment setting, and outcomes. We summarized and critically appraised interventions comprising DHA alone, EPA + DHA, EPA + DHA + GLA, or EPA + DHA with or without vitamin D, stratified by intervention composition and outcome domain. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library/CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and Embase were last searched on 8 July 2026, supplemented by citation searching. Eligible studies prospectively administered EPA and/or DHA during chemotherapy and reported inflammatory/biological, nutritional/functional, quality-of-life, treatment-related, anticancer-response, or safety outcomes. Active co-supplementation was analyzed separately. Owing to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively; risk of bias and outcome-specific certainty were assessed using RoB 2-informed and GRADE approaches. Results: Fourteen reports representing ten prospective interventional trials were included. No eligible EPA-only trial was found. Interventions comprised EPA + DHA/fish oil without another active nutrient, DHA alone, EPA + DHA plus gamma-linolenic acid, and a factorial trial of EPA + DHA with or without vitamin D. One trial reported lower paclitaxel-induced neuropathy, whereas another found no benefit for paclitaxel-associated acute pain or neuropathic symptoms. Biomarker, nutritional, functional, and quality-of-life findings were inconsistent and often derived from small trials, exploratory or compliance-restricted analyses, companion reports, or co-supplementation designs. No consistent improvement in treatment response or survival was demonstrated. Serious supplementation-related adverse events were not reported, although adverse-event reporting varied. Certainty was low for safety and very low for efficacy-related domains. Conclusions: Current evidence is preliminary. The evaluated interventions appeared generally tolerated, but independent clinical efficacy of DHA alone, EPA + DHA without another active nutrient, EPA + DHA + GLA, or EPA + DHA with or without vitamin D during breast cancer chemotherapy remains unproven.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.