Postdiagnostic Red Meat, Poultry, and Egg Intake and Risk of Prostate Cancer Progression and Mortality: A Systematic Review
Sandhu S, Teshome H, Van Blarigan EL, Chan JM, Kenfield SA, Graff RE
The Journal of urology · 0 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2026-08-17 · J Urol · pág. 101097JU0000000000005263
- Editorial
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Citado
- 0 citas · más que el 78% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 0 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Palabras clave
- Prostate cancer, MEDLINE, Risk assessment, Prostate, Prostate-specific antigen
6 autores
- Simran Sandhu🇺🇸University of California, San Francisco
- Haile Teshome🇺🇸University of California, San Francisco
- Erin Lynn Van Blarigan🇺🇸University of California, San Francisco
- June M. Chan🇺🇸University of California, San Francisco
- Stacey A. Kenfield🇺🇸University of California, San Francisco
- Rebecca E. Graff🇺🇸University of California, San Francisco
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to systematically review evidence on associations of postdiagnostic consumption of red meat, poultry, and eggs with prostate cancer outcomes among men diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Methods
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase through July 17, 2025, with no date restrictions. Eligible studies included prospective cohorts examining postdiagnostic consumption of red meat, poultry, and eggs in relation to prostate cancer progression (eg, biochemical recurrence, initiation of secondary treatment, metastases, and prostate cancer-specific mortality) and/or all-cause mortality (ACM) in men with prostate cancer. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias.
Results
Six cohort studies including > 10,000 men with prostate cancer met inclusion criteria. Across 5 studies, total red meat consumption was not associated with progression outcomes, while 1 of 2 studies evaluating ACM reported a positive relationship. However, 2 studies indicated that replacement of red meat with poultry or fish was associated with lower risk of progression or ACM. One study reported a positive association between processed red meat intake and both prostate cancer-specific mortality and ACM, although 4 other studies reported no significant association. Total poultry intake was not significantly associated with progression. By contrast, poultry with skin was linked to higher risk in 2 studies (1 significant), whereas poultry without skin was not associated with progression. Poultry intake was associated with lower ACM risk in the only study evaluating this relationship. Evidence for egg consumption was inconsistent; a positive association with progression was observed in 1 study with especially high intake in the highest category (∼5.5 servings/week), whereas no associations were found in 4 studies where intakes were lower in the highest categories (≥ 2.5-3 servings/week). One out of 2 studies demonstrated a positive relationship with ACM.
Conclusions
Evidence linking postdiagnostic intake of red meat, poultry, and eggs with prostate cancer progression remain limited and inconsistent, although stronger statistical evidence was observed for ACM. Prostate cancer progression risk may be specific to preparation methods (eg, poultry with skin) and higher egg intake (> 3-5 servings/week), while replacing red meat with skinless poultry or fish may offer clinical benefit. Additional well-designed prospective studies are needed.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.