Music intervention for reducing anxiety in patients undergoing CT or MRI examinations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Hu P, Zhang L, Ren J, Wang M
Frontiers in psychiatry · 0 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2026-08-05 · Front Psychiatry · vol. 17 · pág. 1864214
- Editorial
- Frontiers Media
- Citado
- 0 citas · más que el 50% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 48 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Music Therapy and Health · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Palabras clave
- music intervention, anxiety reduction, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, preprocedural anxiety, non-pharmacological treatment, heart rate, oxygen saturation, patient cooperation, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, heterogeneity
4 autores
- Peng Hu
- Lei Zhang
- Jie Ren
- Meng Wang
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are essential diagnostic tools but often provoke significant anxiety in patients, which may compromise image quality and patient cooperation. Non-pharmacological interventions such as music have been proposed as feasible alternatives to anxiolytic medications. However, the evidence supporting music interventions in radiology settings has not been systematically synthesized.
Objective
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of music intervention on anxiety in patients undergoing CT or MRI.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception to March 1, 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating music interventions versus control conditions (e.g., usual care or headphones only) in patients undergoing CT or MRI were included. Outcomes included anxiety [State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), or Child Anxiety Metacognition Scale (CAM-S)], heart rate (HR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2). Standardized mean differences (SMDs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed by measurement tool, imaging modality, and patient population.
Results
Six RCTs (n=972 patients) were included. Music significantly reduced post-intervention anxiety compared with control (SMD = -1.94, 95% CI: -3.59 to -0.28, p=0.02, I²=98.5%). Analysis of pre-to-post change in anxiety also favored music (SMD = -0.74, 95% CI: -1.22 to -0.26, p=0.003, I²=80.5%). Music did not significantly affect HR (WMD = -3.99 bpm, 95% CI: -9.65 to 1.67, p=0.17, I²=94.6%) or SpO2 (WMD = 0.30%, 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.86, p=0.30, I²=74.6%). Subgroup analyses suggested potential effect modification by measurement tool and imaging modality, but heterogeneity remained high. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of anxiety outcomes.
Conclusion
Pooled estimates suggest a reduction in anxiety favoring music, but the extreme heterogeneity (I² = 98.5%) indicates that the studies do not share a common effect size; therefore, the pooled estimate may not represent a clinically meaningful common effect. Music appears safe and low-cost, but conclusions should be drawn cautiously. Future high-quality RCTs with standardized protocols are needed to optimize implementation strategies.
Systematic review registration
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD420261356881.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.