Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2026Acceso abierto

Does Omega-3 Help After All in Autism Spectrum Disorder? An Update Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Sánchez-García I, Sánchez-Quesada C

Nutrients · 0 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-08-28 · Nutrients · vol. 18 · número 17 · pág. 2821
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
0 citas · más que el 59% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
31 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Autism Spectrum Disorder Research · Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Palabras clave
autism spectrum disorder, omega-3 supplementation, irritability, social withdrawal, stereotypy, hyperactivity, behavioral symptoms, neuroinflammation, outcome harmonization, complementary therapy, publication bias, heterogeneous effects, subgroup analysis
MeSH
humans, fatty acids, omega-3, treatment outcome, dietary supplements, child, child, preschool, randomized controlled trials as topic, autism spectrum disorder

2 autores

  • Inmaculada Sánchez-García🇪🇸Universidad de Jaén
  • Cristina Sánchez‐Quesada🇪🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidad de Jaén

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background/objectives

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) affects approximately 60 × 104 incident cases, 283.3 × 105 prevalent cases, and 43.1 × 105 DALYs globally and is frequently accompanied by irritability, hyperactivity, and social withdrawal linked to low-grade neuroinflammation. Omega-3 supplementation is among the most common complementary approaches used by families, but clinical evidence remains inconsistent, and prior meta-analyses have relied on a single outcome instrument. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of omega-3 supplementation on ASD-associated behavioral symptoms by harmonizing outcomes across multiple validated instruments.

Methods

Twelve randomized controlled trials (number of studies per domain: k = 6-12) were identified through a systematic search of ten databases (CRD420261390092). Outcomes from eight instruments (ABC, CGI-I, BASC-2, SRS/SRS-2, GARS-2, CARS/SDQ, VABS/PLS-4/PDDBI, and CBCL) were mapped onto five behavioral domains: Irritability, Lethargy/Social Withdrawal, Stereotypy, Hyperactivity, and Inappropriate Speech/Communication. Random-effects models (REML, Knapp-Hartung adjustment) pooled Hedges' g for each domain, with fixed-effects, subgroup, and PET-PEESE publication-bias sensitivity analyses.

Results

Significant pooled effects favoring omega-3 supplementation were observed for Irritability (g = -0.287, 95% CI [-0.562, -0.013], p = 0.043) and Inappropriate Speech/Communication (g = -0.213, 95% CI [-0.363, -0.063], p = 0.010). Lethargy/Social Withdrawal, Stereotypy, and Hyperactivity showed trivial-to-small, non-significant effects. Heterogeneity was negligible (I2 ≤ 0.83%) in four domains; Hyperactivity showed moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 37.86%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, and no evidence of publication bias was detected.

Conclusions

Expanding synthesis beyond a single outcome instrument revealed statistically significant, though clinically modest, benefits of omega-3 supplementation on irritability and communication symptoms in ASD, effects undetectable in prior smaller, single-instrument analyses. These findings support its consideration as a low-risk adjunctive option, while larger, adequately powered trials remain needed to confirm clinical relevance.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.