Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio transversal2026Financiación no declaradaAcceso abierto

Latent Profiles of Problematic Short-Video Use and Presenteeism Among Hospital Nurses: The Mediating Role of Work Interference With Personal Life

Liu Z, Li M, Liu Y, Yang P, Liu W, Hu B

Nursing open · 0 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio transversal (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2026-10-01 · Nurs Open · vol. 13 · número 10 · pág. e70879
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
0 citas · más que el 94% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
30 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Work-Family Balance Challenges · Workplace Health and Well-being · Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
MeSH
humans, cross-sectional studies, adult, middle aged, nursing staff, hospital, china, female, male, surveys and questionnaires, presenteeism

6 autores

  • Zhaoping LiuGeneral Hospital of Central Theater Command
  • Mengsi LiGeneral Hospital of Central Theater Command
  • Yang Liu🇨🇳Central South University; Changsha Medical University; Changsha Central Hospital; University of South China
  • Yang Pan🇨🇳Hunan Normal University
  • Wen Liu · autor de correspondenciaGeneral Hospital of Central Theater Command
  • Bei Hu · autor de correspondenciaGeneral Hospital of Central Theater Command

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Aim

To identify latent profiles of problematic short-video use among nurses from three tertiary hospitals in Wuhan, examine factors associated with presenteeism and assess indirect associations through work interference with personal life.

Design

A cross-sectional survey.

Methods

From October to December 2025, 680 nurses recruited through convenience sampling completed measures of problematic short-video use, work interference with personal life and presenteeism. Latent profile, hierarchical multiple linear regression and bootstrap path analyses were conducted. The path model adjusted for age, monthly income and night-shift frequency.

Results

Four profiles were identified: low-symptom use, moderate escapism-tolerance, high escapism-persistent use and generalized high symptoms. Monthly income, work interference with personal life and membership in the moderate escapism-tolerance and generalized high-symptom profiles were independently associated with presenteeism. Compared with the low-symptom profile, all three other profiles were indirectly associated with greater presenteeism through work interference with personal life. Direct associations remained evident for the moderate escapism-tolerance and generalized high-symptom profiles, but not for the high escapism-persistent-use profile.

Conclusion

Problematic short-video use was heterogeneous and associated with nurses' work-nonwork experiences and presenteeism. Work interference with personal life may represent a statistical pathway linking profile membership to presenteeism, although the cross-sectional design precludes causal or temporal conclusions.

Implications for the profession

Strategies that protect off-job recovery, support healthy digital boundaries and reduce work interference with personal life warrant evaluation.

Impact

This study identifies distinct problematic-use profiles and profile-specific associations with work interference and presenteeism among nurses from three tertiary hospitals.

Reporting method

The study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement.

No patient or public contribution

Patients and the public were not involved in the study design, conduct, analysis, interpretation or manuscript preparation.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.