Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2026Acceso abierto

Doomscrolling, mental health, and psychological well-being in adolescents and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Li Q, Yin X

Frontiers in psychology · 0 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2026-09-18 · Front Psychol · vol. 17 · pág. 1893800
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
0 citas · más que el 57% de estudios similares · 0.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Mental Health via Writing
Palabras clave
doomscrolling, mental health, psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, psychological distress, life satisfaction, adolescents, adults, social media addiction, problematic internet use, causal inference limitations, residual confounding, ecological momentary assessment

2 autores

  • Qi Li🇨🇳Aerospace Center Hospital
  • Xinrui Yin🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaAerospace Center Hospital

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Doomscrolling is persistent or repetitive engagement with predominantly negative, threatening, or distressing online information, often accompanied by difficulty disengaging. It overlaps with, but is not interchangeable with, problematic social media use, general negative-news exposure, or broader problematic internet use. We synthesized associations between doomscrolling and mental-health or psychological well-being outcomes.

Methods

This PROSPERO-registered systematic review and meta-analysis (CRD420261395295) followed PRISMA 2020. Searches covered nine bibliographic, registry, grey-literature, and citation sources through 20 May 2026. Article- or supplement-reported zero-order Pearson or Spearman correlations were synthesized using Fisher's z transformation and random-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood estimation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Adjusted regression or path coefficients and duplicated same-sample scale versions were not pooled. Design-appropriate JBI checklists and GRADE were used for critical appraisal and certainty assessment.

Results

Forty-four reports representing 44 unique studies were included. Twenty-one studies (23 independent analytic samples) contributed 40 effects to the five primary meta-analyses; the remaining 23 reports contributed narrative or nonprimary quantitative evidence. Doomscrolling was associated with anxiety (r = 0.35, 95% CI 0.27-0.43), depression (r = 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.52), psychological distress (r = 0.51, 95% CI 0.37-0.62), lower psychological well-being (r = -0.29, 95% CI - 0.38 to -0.20), and lower life satisfaction (r = -0.25, 95% CI - 0.37 to -0.13). Heterogeneity was high in every domain; for psychological distress, I 2 was 86.5% and four of five contributing studies were from Türkiye. Certainty was very low for all five outcomes.

Conclusion

Doomscrolling is associated with poorer mental-health and well-being outcomes, but the evidence does not establish causality. Cross-sectional designs, high heterogeneity, residual confounding, and geographic concentration limit inference. Standardized measurement, longitudinal and ecological momentary assessment studies, experiments, and preregistered cross-cultural research are needed.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261395295, identifier PROSPERO (CRD420261395295).

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.