Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes1995

Low serum cholesterol and mortality. Which is the cause and which is the effect?

Iribarren C, Reed DM, Chen R, Yano K, Dwyer JH

Circulation · 84 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Gobierno
NHLBI NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01 HV 02901); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N0 1-HC-02901)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
1995-11-01 · Circulation · vol. 92 · número 9 · págs. 2396–2403
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
135 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 9.2× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
76 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health · Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism · Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Palabras clave
low serum cholesterol, mortality, reverse causality, cancer mortality, liver disease mortality, all-cause mortality, Japanese-American men, Honolulu Heart Program
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, cholesterol, risk factors, survival analysis, cohort studies, follow-up studies, prospective studies, aged, middle aged, hawaii, japan, male, asian

5 autores

  • Carlos Iribarren🇺🇸University of Southern California; Kuakini Medical Center; Buck Institute for Research on Aging
  • DWAYNE M. REED🇺🇸University of Southern California; Kuakini Medical Center; Buck Institute for Research on Aging
  • Randi Chen🇺🇸University of Southern California; Kuakini Medical Center; Buck Institute for Research on Aging
  • Katsuhiko Yano🇺🇸University of Southern California; Kuakini Medical Center; Buck Institute for Research on Aging
  • James H. Dwyer🇺🇸University of Southern California; Kuakini Medical Center; Buck Institute for Research on Aging

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Many studies have reported an association between a low or lowered blood total cholesterol (TC) level and subsequent nonatherosclerotic disease incidence or death. The question of whether low TC is a true risk factor or alternatively a consequence of occult disease at the time of TC measurement remains unsettled. To shed new light onto this problem, we analyzed TC change over a 6- year period (from exam 1 in 1965 through 1968 to exam 3 in 1971 through 1974) in relation to subsequent 16-year mortality in a cohort of Japanese American men.

Methods and results

The study was based on 5941 men 45 to 68 years of age without prior history of coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, or gastrointestinal-liver disease at exam 1 who also participated in exam 3 of the Honolulu Heart Program. The association of TC change with mortality end points was investigated with two different approaches (continuous and categorical TC change) with standard survival analysis techniques. Falling TC level was accompanied by a subsequent increased risk of death caused by some cancers (hemopoietic, esophageal, and prostate), noncardiovascular noncancer causes (particularly liver disease), and all causes. The risk-factor-adjusted rate of all-cause mortality was 30% higher (relative risk, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.59) among persons with a decline from middle (180 to 239 mg/dL) to low (< 180 mg/dL) TC than in persons remaining at a stable middle level. By contrast, there was no significant increase in all-cause mortality risk among cohort men with stable low TC levels. Nonillness mortality (deaths caused by trauma and suicide) was not related to either TC change or the average of TC levels in exams 1 and 3.

Conclusions

These results add strength to the reverse-causality proposition that catabolic diseases cause TC to decrease.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.