Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado1995Financiación no declarada

The effect of regular sunscreen use on vitamin D levels in an Australian population. Results of a randomized controlled trial

Marks R, Foley PA, Jolley D, Knight KR, Harrison J, Thompson SC

Archives of dermatology · 136 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
1995-04-01 · Arch Dermatol · vol. 131 · número 4 · págs. 415–421
Editorial
American Medical Association
Citado
242 citas · más que el 95% de estudios similares · 4.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
0 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Skin Protection and Aging · melanin and skin pigmentation
Palabras clave
sunscreen use, vitamin D deficiency, 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, skin cancer prevention, actinic keratosis, older adults, serum vitamin D levels, sun exposure
MeSH
humans, vitamin d deficiency, vitamin d, sunscreening agents, double-blind method, adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, australia, female, male

1 autor

  • Robin Marks · autor de correspondencia

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background and design

Studies published have suggested a possibility that regular use of sunscreen to prevent skin cancer may put the population, particularly elderly people, at risk of vitamin D deficiency. We aimed to determine whether regular use of sunscreens in the normal adult population, as recommended by public health authorities for the prevention of skin cancer, may put individuals at risk of vitamin D deficiency. A randomized double-blind control trial of the daily use of a broad-spectrum sunscreen (sun protection factor [SPF] 17) vs placebo cream over a summer period in Australia was conducted in 113 people aged 40 years and over, with sampling stratified by age. All participants had at least one solar keratosis. Serum samples taken at the beginning and at the end of the study were analyzed for 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3.

Results

Mean levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 rose significantly by the same amount in both groups over the period of the study (placebo, +12.8 mmol/L; sunscreen, +11.8 mmol/L). Mean levels of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 increased significantly in the placebo group only (placebo, +10.8 pmol/L; sunscreen, +1.3 pmol/L), but for no subject in either group was the level of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 outside the reference range either at the start or at the end of the study. There were no significant differences by age, sex, and skin type in the change in 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 over the study period.

Conclusions

No person, including those aged 70 years and over, developed any vitamin D levels outside the normal reference range during the period of the study. The data suggest that over an Australian summer sufficient sunlight is received, probably through both the sunscreen itself and the lack of total skin cover at all times, to allow adequate vitamin D production in people who are recommended to use sunscreens regularly. More work is required to elucidate the relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, particularly during the different seasons of the year.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.