Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis1996Financiación no declarada

Are vitamin D receptor polymorphisms associated with bone mineral density? A meta-analysis

Cooper GS, Umbach DM

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 239 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
1996-12-01 · J Bone Miner Res · vol. 11 · número 12 · págs. 1841–1849
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Citado
411 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 5.0× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
34 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Palabras clave
vitamin D receptor, VDR polymorphisms, bone mineral density, genetic association, hip bone density, spine bone density, distal radius, age interaction, menopausal status
MeSH
humans, receptors, calcitriol, aging, menopause, bone density, gene frequency, genotype, polymorphism, genetic, alleles, adult, aged, middle aged, female, ethnicity

2 autores

  • Glinda S. Cooper🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • David M. Umbach🇺🇸National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms have been strongly associated with bone mineral density (BMD) in some studies but not in others. We used a meta-analytic approach to assess quantitatively the association between VDR and BMD and to examine the influence of specific study characteristics (e.g., skeletal site, mean age of subjects, menopausal status) on the reported results. Sixteen papers published in peer-reviewed journals through July 1996 were included. We calculated the mean difference, percent difference, and effect size (mean difference divided by standard deviation), comparing BMD between homozygous genotypes. At the hip, BMD in the BB genotype was lower than in the bb genotype (mean difference, -0.02 g/cm2; percent difference, -2.4% and effect size -0.18; p = 0.032). At the spine, the mean difference was -0.03 g/cm2; percent difference, -2.5%; and effect size, -0.19; p = 0.062. At the distal radius, the VDR effect was estimated as the mean difference, -0.01 g/cm2; percent difference, -1.7%; and effect size, -0.16; p = 0.078. The spine measurements exhibited the greatest between- and within-study variability. The difference in hip BMD between genotypes was larger (i.e., a more negative number) among the younger women and seemed to decrease with increasing age. However, statistical evidence for this trend was weak (p = 0.06). Data from the spine and the radius showed no evidence of a comparable interaction of the VDR effect with age. When we omitted data from the first report of an association between VDR polymorphisms and BMD, our analyses gave similar results, although the overall effect estimates were smaller. In the combined data from 29 study groups, the BB genotype frequency was 17.2, 4.9, and 2.3% in studies of whites, blacks, and Asians, respectively. VDR polymorphisms represent one genetic factor affecting BMD, but further research into the mechanisms, clinical significance, and its relation between other genetic and environmental factors is needed.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.