Are vitamin D receptor polymorphisms associated with bone mineral density? A meta-analysis
Cooper GS, Umbach DM
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 239 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 1996-12-01 · J Bone Miner Res · vol. 11 · número 12 · págs. 1841–1849
- Editorial
- Oxford University Press
- Citado
- 411 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 5.0× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 34 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Vitamin D Research Studies · Bone health and osteoporosis research · Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Palabras clave
- vitamin D receptor, VDR polymorphisms, bone mineral density, genetic association, hip bone density, spine bone density, distal radius, age interaction, menopausal status
- MeSH
- humans, receptors, calcitriol, aging, menopause, bone density, gene frequency, genotype, polymorphism, genetic, alleles, adult, aged, middle aged, female, ethnicity
2 autores
- Glinda S. Cooper🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
- David M. Umbach🇺🇸National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphisms have been strongly associated with bone mineral density (BMD) in some studies but not in others. We used a meta-analytic approach to assess quantitatively the association between VDR and BMD and to examine the influence of specific study characteristics (e.g., skeletal site, mean age of subjects, menopausal status) on the reported results. Sixteen papers published in peer-reviewed journals through July 1996 were included. We calculated the mean difference, percent difference, and effect size (mean difference divided by standard deviation), comparing BMD between homozygous genotypes. At the hip, BMD in the BB genotype was lower than in the bb genotype (mean difference, -0.02 g/cm2; percent difference, -2.4% and effect size -0.18; p = 0.032). At the spine, the mean difference was -0.03 g/cm2; percent difference, -2.5%; and effect size, -0.19; p = 0.062. At the distal radius, the VDR effect was estimated as the mean difference, -0.01 g/cm2; percent difference, -1.7%; and effect size, -0.16; p = 0.078. The spine measurements exhibited the greatest between- and within-study variability. The difference in hip BMD between genotypes was larger (i.e., a more negative number) among the younger women and seemed to decrease with increasing age. However, statistical evidence for this trend was weak (p = 0.06). Data from the spine and the radius showed no evidence of a comparable interaction of the VDR effect with age. When we omitted data from the first report of an association between VDR polymorphisms and BMD, our analyses gave similar results, although the overall effect estimates were smaller. In the combined data from 29 study groups, the BB genotype frequency was 17.2, 4.9, and 2.3% in studies of whites, blacks, and Asians, respectively. VDR polymorphisms represent one genetic factor affecting BMD, but further research into the mechanisms, clinical significance, and its relation between other genetic and environmental factors is needed.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.