Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado1998Financiación no declarada

Ultraviolet irradiation corrects vitamin D deficiency and suppresses secondary hyperparathyroidism in the elderly

Chel VG, Ooms ME, Popp-Snijders C, Pavel S, Schothorst AA, Meulemans CC, Lips P

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 113 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
1998-08-01 · J Bone Miner Res · vol. 13 · número 8 · págs. 1238–1242
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Citado
205 citas · más que el 89% de estudios similares · 2.6× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
18 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Vitamin D Research Studies · Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments · Bone health and osteoporosis research
Palabras clave
UVB irradiation, vitamin D deficiency, secondary hyperparathyroidism, parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D3 supplementation, elderly nursing home residents, psychogeriatric patients, serum calcium, minimal erythema dose
MeSH
humans, vitamin d deficiency, hyperparathyroidism, secondary, calcium, cholecalciferol, parathyroid hormone, vitamin d, administration, oral, ultraviolet rays, aged, aged, 80 and over, nursing homes, netherlands, female

7 autores

  • Victor G. M. Chel
  • Marius Ooms🇳🇱Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • C. Popp‐Snijders🇳🇱Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • S Pavel🇳🇱Leiden University; Leiden University Medical Center
  • Albert A. Schothorst🇳🇱Leiden University; Leiden University Medical Center
  • C. C. E. Meulemans
  • Paul T.A.M. Lips🇳🇱 · autor de correspondenciaVrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

The objective of this study was to compare the effect of ultraviolet radiation (UV) and oral vitamin D3 on the vitamin D status and parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration in elderly nursing home patients. The design of the study was a randomized clinical trial. The setting was a psychogeriatric nursing home. Subjects included 45 female psychogeriatric patients with a mean age of 85 years. Exclusion criteria were going outdoors more than once a week and the presence of actinic or cancer skin lesions. Intervention was random allocation of UV-B irradiation at half the minimal erythemal dose of the lower back, three times per week during 12 weeks (UV-B), or oral vitamin D3 400 IU/day during 12 weeks (VIT-D), or no treatment (CONTR). Main outcome measures were change in fasting serum levels of vitamin D metabolites at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks in the treatment groups, compared with the control group. PTH(1-84) was measured at 0 and 12 weeks. Baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) was lower than 30 nmol/l in 95% of the participants. It increased to a median value of around 60 nmol/l after 12 weeks both in the UV-B and VIT-D groups, whereas there was no change in the CONTR group. Serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D increased significantly in the UV-B group. Serum calcium increased significantly in both treatment groups. Serum PTH decreased more than 30% in both treatment groups (p < 0.001), whereas there was no significant change in the control group. Irradiation with UV-B in the very elderly for a few minutes per day leads to adequate improvement of the vitamin D status. It is as effective as oral vitamin D3 in increasing serum 25(OH)D and suppressing secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.